The Wall Street Journal's James R. Hagerty tells us that the brass at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac knew they were taking on risks. He writes, "The emails show that the two government-backed mortgage companies were aware they were taking on more risk as the housing bubble peaked. But the companies pressed ahead with efforts to regain market share they had lost to Wall Street investment banks. They did so by buying loans and securities that increased their exposure to subprime mortgages, for people with weak credit records, and Alt-A mortgages, which typically spare borrowers from having to document their income and assets."
Fannie went through three chief risk officers between 2004 and 2008. As the financial crisis approached they cut their spending on risk control.
Did Freddie fire David Andrukonis for opposing their getting into NINA (no income, no assets) mortgages?
It was not just about market share. They were trying to please their congressional allies, or should I call them their unindicted conspirators.
Tuesday, December 09, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
It is apparent that Mr. Adrukonis was most likely fired because of his opposition to NINAs. When the company goes through three risk managers in three years there is something going terribly wrong. Not to mention documentation and emails from the risk managers voicing there concern only shows the inefficiencies of the executive management. For the executives to keep side-stepping the blame and pushing it aside is childish. The executives need to finally take responsibility for what they did.
Post a Comment