Connor Dougherty, a New York Times economics journalist, does a good job
 analyzing the role housing has played in past recessions and why it may
 not be so crucial in the next.  He writes that housing declines 
presaged all but two of the last eleven recessions.  
Housing starts are 
one of our best leading indicators.  Even in one of his two exceptions 
(the recessions of 1953-54 and 2001), housing starts did a credible job 
of predicting one, 1953-54, leaving only only 2001 as a real anomaly.  Starts led the
 1953-54 recession by nine months and fell 11.3% peak to trough.  In 2001
 housing starts peaked a month after the economy and led by a month at 
the trough.  Peak to trough they fell a mere 6.6%.
The "Greenspan put" did not save Dot.Com investors or IT workers, but did provide a soft landing for housing in 2001.   An Austrian might argue that simply made the ultimate housing bust worse six years later.  
Dougherty bases his anlysis on contributions to GDP from the the work of Edward Leamer.  The latter's prescient 2007 Jackson Hole address, "Housing is the Business Cycle," which emphasizes the importance of housing in recessions.  
Tuesday, February 26, 2019
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
 
 
